News
Maryland High School Students Win 2015 ConSource-Harlan Institute Virtual Supreme Court Competition
June 9, 20152015 Harlan Institute-ConSource Virtual Supreme Court Competition: Round 2
June 1, 20151st Circuit
Petitioner: Diana O. & Mitchell M. (Oswego, Oregon) Respondent: Ammas T. & Max G. (Oswego, Oregon)2nd Circuit
Petitioner: Victoria M. & Hayley B. (Frisco, TX) Respondent: Jacob S. & Danielle T. (Del Valle, TX)3rd Circuit
Petitioner: David E. & Nick P. (Montgomery, MD) Respondent: Briana B. & Apeksha G. (Wicomico, MD)4th Circuit
Petitioner: Zohar H. & Sarah T. (Oswego, Oregon) Respondent: Emily K. & Evan M. (Oswego, Oregon) Congratulations to all of the teams. We will be announcing the teams that will advance to the final round later this week. You can see all of the videos in the tournament here:2015 Harlan Institute-ConSource Virtual Supreme Court Competition: Round 1
May 16, 20151st Circuit
Petitioner #1: Diana O & Mitchell M (OR)
Respondent #1: Emily D. & Camryn C. (MD)
Petitioner #2: Jered J. & Taylor H. (TX)
Respondent #2: Katie B. & Jung O. (MD)
2nd Circuit
Petitioner #3: Victoria M. & Hayley B. (MD)
Respondent #3: Emily K. & Evan M. (OR)
Petitioner #4: David E. & Nick P. (MD)
Respondent #4: Jacob S. & Danielle T. (TX)
3rd Circuit
Petitioner #5: Azhar A. & Blake V. (TX)
Respondent #5: Briana B. & Apeksha G. (MD)
Petitioner #6: Zohar H. & Sarah T. (OR)
Respondent #6: Rachel B. & Steve L. (MD)
4th Circuit
Petitioner #7: Kole H. & Matt W. (WV)
Respondent #7: Connor R. & Brandon J. (TX)
Petitioner #8: Brendan O. & Dominique P. (TX)
Respondent #8: Ammas T. & Max G. (OR)
Announcing the Third Annual Harlan Institute – ConSource Virtual Supreme Court Competition for High School Students
September 2, 2014Building on the success of the 2013 and 2014 Virtual Supreme Court project, the Harlan Institute and The Constitutional Sources Project (ConSource) will host the third annual Virtual Supreme Court competition. This competition offers teams of two high school students the opportunity to research cutting-edge constitutional law, write persuasive appellate briefs, argue against other students through video chats, and try to persuade a panel of esteemed attorneys during oral argument that their side is correct. This year the competition focuses on Zivotofsky v. Kerry, exploring whether the President’s power to diplomatically recognize foreign nations is subject to control by Congress.
The competition is endorsed by the Center for Civic Education’s We The People Program. Robert Leming, Director of the We the People Program found that the “Competition is relevant for high school students studying the Constitution and Bill of Rights.”
ConSource Executive Director Julie Silverbrook believes “the Competition is an excellent opportunity for high school students to develop core civic and constitutional literacy skills. Students are required to read the text of the Constitution, explore the history behind a contemporary constitutional dispute, and construct persuasive arguments. We know that experiences like the Virtual Supreme Court Competition leave a lifelong impression on participating students and encourages them to stay informed and engaged throughout their lives.”
The members of the grand-prize winning team, the Solicitors General of FantasySCOTUS, will receive a free trip, including airfare and one night of hotel accommodations, to Washington, D.C. to attend the ConSource Constitution Day celebration in September 2015. Winners must be at least 18 years old at the time of the trip (it is no problem if the student has already graduated high school in September of 2015, so long as he or she was in high school during the competition). This offer is open to U.S. residents only. Members of the runner-up team will each receive an iPad Mini. Members of the third and fourth place teams will each receive a $100 Amazon.com Gift card.
Josh Blackman, President of the Harlan Institute, champions the Virtual Supreme Court, which provides an “unprecedented opportunity for high school students to engage in the highest level of appellate advocacy. They research the issues, write briefs, and make oral arguments before our judges. The strong caliber of the winning teams last year really impressed us. We can’t wait to see how the teams perform this year!”
Teachers interested in participating should sign up at www.HarlanInstitute.org, add an account, read the problem, and get started!
Please send any questions to info@harlaninstitute.org or info@consource.org.
Congratulations to the Winners of the Harlan Institute-ConSource Virtual Supreme Court Competition
June 3, 2014- Grand Prize - Michelle McEvoy and Uma Chatterjee, Frisco CTE, Frisco, TX. Here is their brief supporting the Respondent. Michelle and Uma won a free trip to Washington, D.C. to attend ConSource's 2014 Constitution Day celebration.
- Second Prize - Dante Barnes and Peter Kim, Wicomico HS, Wicomico, MD. Here is their brief supporting the Petitioner. Dante and Peter each won an iPad.
- Third Prize - Luke Segovia and Jacob Shaw, Del Valle HS, Del Valle, HS. Here is their brief supporting the Petitioner. Luke and Jacob each won a $100 Amazon Gift Card.
- Honorable Mention - Jennifer Gomez and Jason Cano, Del Valle HS, Del Valle, HS. Here is their brief supporting the Respondent.
Grand Prize - Frisco CTE, Frisco, TX
Uma Chatterjee was born in Queens, NY and lived there until she was 11. She has lived in the North Dallas area for seven 7 years. She sings competitively. She is considering going to school at American University of the University of Texas at Dallas, and wants to double-major in political science and psychology. Uma wants to work as an attorney focusing on civil liberties, ideally with the ACLU. Michelle McEvoy was born in Livingston, New Jersey. She plans on attending New York University, majoring in Political science with a minor in international affairs. She is a member of the French club, Future Farmers of America, and the enjoys photography, volunteering.Uma Chatterjee (left) and Michelle McEvoy and (right).
Second Prize - Dante Barnes and Peter Kim, Wicomico HS, Wicomico, MD. Dante Barnes is a sophomore at Wicomico High School in Salisbury, Maryland. He is currently enrolled in AP government. He plans on joining the Army after high school.Peter Kim is a sophomore who attends Wicomico High School in Salisbury, Maryland. He was born in South Korea and likes to play must. He plans on going to college to become a doctor after high school.
Announcing the 2014 Harlan Institute-ConSource Virtual Supreme Court Competition
October 6, 2013Building on the success of the 2013 Virtual Supreme Court project, the Harlan Institute has partnered with The Constitutional Sources Project (ConSource) to host the second annual Virtual Supreme Court competition. This competition offers teams of two high school students the opportunity to research cutting-edge constitutional law, write persuasive appellate briefs, argue against other students through video chats, and try to persuade a panel of esteemed attorneys during oral argument that their side is correct. This year the competition focuses on National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning Corporation.
The competition is endorsed by the Center for Civic Education's We The People Competition:
“The Center for Civic Education is excited to endorse the Virtual Supreme Court Competition. The Competition is relevant for high school students studying the Constitution and Bill of Rights.” -Robert Leming, Director, We the People Programs, Center for Civic Education
The Question
Resolved: What is the scope of the President's recess appointment power?
The Rules
This competition has two stages, which mirror the process by which attorneys litigate cases.Stage One: The Briefing
A team of two students will be responsible for writing an appellate brief arguing for one side of the topic. This brief will be posted on their class’s FantasySCOTUS. Blog posts will be due by February 28, 2014. Completed briefs will be awarded the ConSource Badge. You can see the winning briefs from 2013 here.Stage Two: Oral Arguments
The Harlan Institute and ConSource will select the top four briefs taking the affirmative position, and the top brief briefs taking the negative position, and seed them for oral arguments. All eight teams will compete in a virtual oral argument session over Google+ Hangout judged by staff members at the Harlan Institute and ConSource. Only teams that submit briefs that fully comply with all of the rules will be considered for oral argument.- The first round of oral arguments, the District court, will match up the top eight teams, in March of 2014.
- The four teams that advance will meet up in the second round of oral arguments, the Court of Appeals, in April of 2014.
- The top two teams that advance will meet in the final round of oral arguments, the Supreme Court, in May of 2014. These two teams will compete virtually in front of a panel of prominent appellate attorneys. You can see the video from the 2013 Competition here. The winners will be crowned the Solicitors General of FantasySCOTUS, and win an amazing prize.
The Prizes
Grand Prize - The Solicitors General of FantasySCOTUS
The members of grand-prize winning team, the Solicitors General of FantasySCOTUS, will receive a free trip, including airfare and one night of hotel accommodations, to Washington, D.C. to attend the ConSource Constitution Day celebration in September 2014. Winners must be at least 18 years at the time of the trip (it is no problem if the student has already graduated high school in September of 2014, so long as he or she was in high school during the competition). This offer is open to U.S. residents only.Second Prize
Members of the runner-up team will each receive an iPad.Third Prize
Members of the third and fourth place teams will each receive a $100 Amazon.com Giftcard.Instructions
Ask your teacher to sign up your class on FantasySCOTUS (all High School students can participate), add an account, read the problem, and get started! Good luck. Please send any questions to info@harlaninstitute.org or info@consource.org.Dallas Morning News Covers Harlan Institute-ConSource Virtual Supreme Court Competition
May 8, 2013Anderson, of Centennial, and Parsons, of Liberty, won the nationwide Harlan Institute’s Virtual Supreme Court competition in which they had to write appellate briefs and argue against other student teams via online video chats presented before a panel of professional attorneys. This year the case argued by the students was Fisher v. University of Texas, which is currently pending before the United States Supreme Court concerning an affirmative action admissions policy at the University of Texas at Austin.Congratulations to the two winners from Frisco, Texas, D.J. Anderson and Jason Parsons, who won a trip to ConSource’s Fifth Annual Capital City Constitution Day program. Here is a video of the event: More coverage from Frisco ISD, ConSource, and the Storm Lake Pilot Tribune.
Texas High School Students Win 2013 ConSource-Harlan Institute Virtual Supreme Court Competition
April 24, 2013Live: The 2013 Harlan Institute – ConSource Virtual Supreme Court Competition: Fisher v. University of Texas, Austin
April 22, 2013The Harlan Institute-ConSource Virtual Supreme Court Competition
The Harlan Institute has partnered with The Constitutional Sources Project (ConSource) to host the inaugural Virtual Supreme Court competition. This competition offers teams of two high school students the opportunity to research cutting-edge constitutional law, write persuasive appellate briefs, argue against other students through video chats, and try to persuade a panel of esteemed attorneys during oral argument that their side is correct. This year the competition focuses on Fisher v. University of Texas.Resolved: Is the Fourteenth Amendment Color-Blind?
Monday, April 22, 2013
Introduction: 10:15-11:20 EDT
Josh Blackman, The Harlan Institute
Championship Round: 10:20-1045
Team 1 (Petitioner - Fisher) v. Team 2 (Respondent - Texas)
Team 1 (Petitioner): DJ Anderson & Jason Parson (Frisco CTE Center, Frisco, Texas)
Team 2 (Respondent): Sarah Sietmann, Konnor Rodriguez (Frisco CTE Center, Frisco, Texas)
Judges:
- Tom Krattenmaker
- Matthew Fitzgerald
- Julie Silverbrook, Executive Director of ConSource
-
Petitioner-Anderson (5 minutes)
-
Respondent-Sietmann (5 minutes)
-
Petitioner-Parson, Rebuttal (3 minutes)
-
Respondent- Rodriguez, Rebuttal (3 minutes)
Runner-Up Round:10:45-11:10
Team 1 (Petitioner - Fisher) v. Team 2 (Respondent - Texas)
Team 1 (Petitioner): Katie Gibson, Amber Decker (Sioux Central High School, Sioux Rapids, Iowa)
Team 2 (Respondent): Baylee Hammonds and D. Wiggins (Frisco CTE Center, Frisco, Texas)
Judges:
-
Petitioner 1 (5 minutes)
-
Respondent-Hammonds (5 minutes)
-
Petitioner 2 (3 minutes)
-
Respondent-Wiggins (3 minutes)
Concluding Remarks: 11:10-11:15
Julie Silverbrook, ConSource