The Harlan Institute and ConSource Host the Championship Round of the National Virtual Supreme Court Competition for High School Student on May 18 at Georgetown University Law CenterMay 14, 2017
Congratulations to the Finalists of the Harlan Institute-ConSource OT 2016 Virtual Supreme Court CompetitionMarch 13, 2017
Congratulations to the Top Eight Teams of the Harlan Institute-ConSource OT 2016 Virtual Supreme Court CompetitionMarch 9, 2017
PetitionersLucy Mini and Arjun Ahuja (Greenwich High School, Connecticut) Sarah Kwartler and Anika Todt (Lake Oswego High School, Oregon) Kate Smitherman and Joanna Boyer (Creekview High School, Texas) SaraJane Griffiths and Siobhán Nolan (Lake Oswego HS, Oregon)
RespondentsMahak Merchant and Simon Pena (Creekview HS, Texas) Jacklin Chang Emma Austin (Lake Oswego HS, Oregon) Riley Tribble and John Fregonara (Elkins HS, West Virginia) Grace Reily-Simmons and Tyanin Opdahl (Lake Oswego, HS)
Support the Harlan Institute $16 of 2016 CampaignDecember 27, 2016
You can see the winning briefs from 2013 (Fisher I), 2014 (Noel Canning), 2015 (Zivotofsky), and 2016 (Fisher II). The grand prize for the top two students is a trip to Washington, D.C. to celebrate ConSource's Constitution Day 2013. Members of the runner-up team will each receive an iPad. I ask your help to support the prizes for these amazing students. 100% of your tax-deductible donation will be used to cover the costs of bringing the students to our nation's capital. The Harlan Institute has no salaried employees, and all of our overhead costs are covered by sponsorships. Thank you for your support. Sincerely, Josh Blackman President, The Harlan Institute
Announcing the 2017 Harlan Institute-ConSource Virtual Supreme Court CompetitionOctober 3, 2016
The Harlan Institute and The Constitutional Sources Project (ConSource) announce their Fifth Annual Virtual Supreme Court Competition. This competition offers teams of two high school students the opportunity to research cutting-edge constitutional law, write persuasive appellate briefs, argue against other students through video chats, and try to persuade a panel of esteemed attorneys during oral argument that their side is correct. This year the competition focuses on Trinity Lutheran Church v. Sarah Parker Pauley.
The competition is endorsed by the Center for Civic Education's We The People Competition:
“The Center for Civic Education is excited to endorse the Virtual Supreme Court Competition. The Competition is relevant for high school students studying the Constitution and Bill of Rights.” -Robert Leming, Director, We the People Programs, Center for Civic Education
The RulesThis competition has two stages, which mirror the process by which attorneys litigate cases. 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016. rules will be considered for oral argument. You can see the video from the 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 competitions. The final round of the Virtual Supreme Court Competition will be held in Philadelphia on April 13, 2017. The Harlan Institute and ConSource will sponsor the top two teams, and their teachers, for a trip to Philadelphia to debate in front of a panel of expert judges, including lawyers, university level debate champions, and legal scholars.
Second PrizeMembers of the runner-up team will each receive an iPad Mini.
Third PrizeMembers of the third and fourth place teams will each receive a $100 Amazon.com Giftcard.
InstructionsAsk your teacher to sign up your class on FantasySCOTUS (all High School students can participate), add an account, read the problem, and get started! Good luck. Please send any questions to firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com.
ConSource-Harlan Institute Virtual Supreme Court Tournament Featured in Washington TimesSeptember 13, 2016
National Constitutional Literacy Campaign partners host several of these annual competitions, including the ConSource-Harlan Institute Virtual Supreme Court Competition, the Center for Civic Education’s We the People: The Citizen and the Constitution Competition, the Constitution Bee, the Marshall-Brennan Constitutional Literacy Project’s Annual Moot Court Competition, the Nethercutt Foundation Citizenship Tournament, and One Generation Away’s Roots of Liberty national essay contest. Despite expressing deep concerns about where the country is headed, most of the students expressed positive views about the future. They draw this optimism, in part, from their experiences with student competitions, which showed these young citizens how to effect positive change at the local, state and national level. Tanya Reyna, a winner of the ConSource-Harlan Institute Virtual Supreme Court Competition, noted that while her local community in Texas suffers from “an influx of drugs and criminals” and has dampened her views about the future of her community and the nation, her experience with the Virtual Supreme Court Competition “eased [her] apprehension” about the future. She said that meeting students, lawyers, professors and judges willing to take time out of their busy schedules “to inform younger generations of citizens about our legal system,” demonstrated to her that “as long as there are citizens like them, America will continue to hold a bright future.”This picture was taken at the National Constitution Center for the final round of our tournament. I am joined by Howard Bashman, Kim Roosevelt, Julie Silverbrook, and Chief Judge McKee (CA3).