harlan logo

News

Over 1 million students K-12 nationwide take online courses

April 6, 2011
The New York Times has a fascinating piece about the explosion in schools permitting their students to take classes online. Here are some of the great statistics about this continuing trend:
In Idaho, the state superintendent of education plans to push a requirement that high-school students take four or more online courses, following a bill that passed the Legislature last week to provide every student with a laptop, paid for from a state fund for educators’ salaries. Chicago and New York City have introduced pilot online learning programs. In New York, Innovation Zone, or iZone, includes online makeup and Advanced Placement courses at 30 high schools, as well as personalized after-school computer drills in math and English for elementary students. The virtual high school says its list of client schools has grown to 770, up 34 percent in two years, because of local budget cuts. Nationwide, an estimated 1.03 million students at the K-12 level took an online course in 2007-8, up 47 percent from two years earlier, according to the Sloan Consortium, an advocacy group for online education. About 200,000 students attend online schools full time, often charter schoolsthat appeal to home-schooling families, according to another report.
Additionally, online courses can expose students to classes that local teachers simply cannot teach:
Reza Namin, superintendent of schools in Westbrook, Me., which faces a $6.5 million budget deficit, said he could not justify continuing to pay a Chinese language teacher for only 10 interested students. But he was able to offer Chinese online through the Virtual High School Global Consortium, a nonprofit school based in Massachusetts.
The Harlan Institute has been at the forefront of the development of free online classes, and looks forward to helping to promote this wonderful educational experience for students across the country.

FantasySCOTUS.net Predictions for 4/4/11

April 4, 2011
Here are the latest predictions from the FantasySCOTUS.net prediction tracker for the 4/4/11 Supreme Court session.
Case Name FantasySCOTUS Prediction Outcome Date Decided Prediction Details
Talk America v. Michigan Bell Affirm Details
US v. Tohono O’odham Nation Affirm Details
Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Association Affirm Details
Sossamon v. Texas Affirm Details
Arizona Christian Tuition v. Winn Reverse Details
Cullen v. Pinholster Reverse Details
AT&T v. Concepcion Affirm Details
Flores-Villar v. US Affirm Details
Amara v. CIGNA Reverse Details
Schwarzenegger v. Plata Affirm Details
Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart Affirm Details
Kentucky v. King Reverse Details
Janus Capital v. 1st Derivative Traders Reverse Details
Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting Affirm Details
General Dynamics Corp. v. US Reverse Details
The Boeing Company v. US Reverse Details
Montana v. Wyoming and North Dakota Affirm Details
Goodyear Lux. Tires, SA v. Brown Reverse Details
J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro Affirm Details
Sykes v. US Reverse Details
Smith v. Bayer Corp. Reverse Details
Stern v. Marshall Affirm Details
US v. Tinklenberg Reverse Details
Bond v. United States Reverse Details
Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB S.A. Affirm Details
Freeman v. US Reverse Details
DePierre v. United States Affirm Details
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Affirm Details
Schindler Elevator Corporation v. US ex rel. Kirk Affirm Details
Alford v. Greene Reverse Details
Camreta v. Greene Reverse Details
Bullcoming v. New Mexico Reverse Details
Ashcroft v. al-Kidd Reverse Details
Davis. v. United States Affirm Details
Fox, v. Vice Affirm Details
Duryea v. Guarnieri Reverse Details
Turner v. Rogers Reverse Details
J. D. B. v. North Carolina Affirm Details
McComish v. Bennett Reverse Details
Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett Reverse Details
CSX Transportation v. McBride Affirm Details
Wal-Mart v. Dukes Reverse Details
Isiogu v. Michigan Bell Affirm Details
PLIVA Inc. v. Mensing Affirm Details
Actavis Elizabeth, L.L.C. v. Mensing Reverse Details
Actavis v. Demahy Reverse Details
Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership Affirm Details
Tapia v. U.S. Affirm Details
American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. Connecticut Affirm Details
United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation Affirm Details
McNeill v. United States Affirm Details
Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. Affirm Details
Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan Reverse Details
Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation Affirm Details
Fowler v. United States Affirm Details

Sign up for FantasySCOTUS before April 5, 2011, and Receive 50 Westlaw Reward Points

April 1, 2011

Constitution Land – A Theme Park from the Harlan Institute

April 1, 2011

Constitution Land – A Theme Park from the Harlan Institute

Release: April 1, 2011 Media Contact: Josh Blackman (202) 294-9003, JBlackman@HarlanInstitute.org. Constitution Land, a planned theme park from the Harlan Institute, will immerse “we the people” in the Constitution of the United States. Through virtual reality simulators, thrill rides, and entertaining shows, visitors will be able to experience our Constitution, and the Supreme Court, unlike ever before. “Constitution Land will be a one-of-a-kind experience,” said Josh Blackman, President of the Harlan Institute. “Only the Harlan Institute, and its innovative approach to civic education could create a theme park to inspire students of all ages to learn more our great Charter.” The Harlan Institute, in consultation with leading academics, historians, engineers, and theme park enthusiasts, has prepared the plans for this groundbreaking education destination. In addition to exhilarating thrill rides based on landmark Supreme Court cases, Constitution Land will feature virtual reality simulators that explore how cases developed, and what will become of our law. Finally, shows, and first-rate accommodations will make a visit to Constitution Land a must for anyone who wants to learn more about the supreme law of the land. Constitution Land’s planned attractions include:

Virtual Reality Simulators

  • FantasySCOTUS: Think you know how the Justices will vote on a current case? Sharpen your wits and compete in FantasySCOTUS, the Harlan Institute’s Supreme Court Fantasy League.
  • The “10th Justice” Experience: What would have happened if the Supreme Court decided a case differently? Marshall ordered Madison to deliver Marbury’s commission?  Dred Scott was found to be a citizen? Homer Plessy was not forced to ride in the segregated car?  This simulator explores these constitutional what ifs.
  • The Originalist Time Machine: What would James Madison think about violent video games, gun violence, or mandating the eating of broccoli? With the Originalist Time Machine, you can ask Founding Fathers avatars–which are programmed based on their writings and philosophies–what they think about contemporary constitutional questions.
  • Scrutiny Land: Witness first-hand deprivations of liberty, and determine what tier of scrutiny is appropriate, and whether the act was unconstitutional.

Thrill Rides

  • Marbury v. Madison Dueling Roller-Coasters: Learn about President John Adams’ midnight appointees, and John Marshall’s failure to timely deliver Marbury’s commission on this speedy coaster that goes from zero to judicial review in (article) 3 seconds.
  • Gibbons v. Ogden Flume Ride: Get wet in interstate commerce as you traverse the treacherous waters between New York and New Jersey.
  • The Zones of Twilight Steel Mill of Terror: Based on Justice Jackson’s famed zone of twilight framework from the Steel Seizure case, this thrilling ride flies you through a haunted steel mill during the height of the Korean War.

Shows

  • Interrogation. The Experience: Volunteers will be subjected to interrogation technique by trained law enforcement officers to illustrate how duress and pressure can influence a suspect.
  • The Footnote Four String Quartet: Enjoy a musical revue exploring constitutional law in song.

Accommodations

  • Lochner’s Bakery- Sample some of the most “healthful,” and delicious baked goods, including breads, muffins, and hot cross buns.
  • Carolene Products Creamery: Enjoy your favorite dairy products, including cheese, ice cream, and yogurt, made from fresh, or filled milk.
  • The Slaughter-House Cases New Orleans BBQ- You have the “privilege” to savor some of the best flavors of Southern BBQ, or the “immunity” to sample healthy desserts.
  • Granholm v. Heald Dormant Wine Bar- Imbibe delicious wines imported from out of state.
Construction on Constitution Land is scheduled to begin on September 17, 2012, Constitution Day, outside of Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, near the site of George Washington’s famous crossing of the Delaware River, and minutes away from Philadelphia, the Cradle of our Constitution.

The Harlan Institute

The Harlan Institute’s mission is to bring a stylized law school experience into the high school classroom to ensure that our next generation of leaders has a proper understanding of our most fundamental laws. By utilizing the expertise of leading legal scholars and the interactivity of online games, Harlan will introduce students to our Constitution, the cases of the United States Supreme Court, and our system of justice. Harlan’s long term strategic goal is to develop condensed law school courses that can be taught at no cost in high schools across the country using engaging online programs. In case you didn't realize it, this is an April Fool's Joke.

My Harlan Institute Lecture at State Department International Visitor Leadership Program

March 25, 2011
On Friday, March 18, 2011, I had the distinct honor and privilege of advising a group of Middle Eastern judges from Iraq, Jordan, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Tunisia under the auspices of the State Department’s International Visitor Leadership Program. This program invited these foreign jurists, who are selected as the rising stars in the government (impressive alumni include President Nicholas Sarkozy and Prime Minister Hamid Karzi) to the United States to learn about the rule of law and judicial reform. I was invited to speak to the group as a representative of the Harlan Institute about how American students learn about the law, Constitution, and the Supreme Court. All too often lawyers are critical of such meetings, contending that American lawyers and jurists are influenced by foreign law. I disagree—the door swings both ways. My aim was to introduce our guests not just to how Americans learn about the law, but what the students actually learn. I began the session by handing each guest a copy of the United States Constitution translated into Arabic, courtesy of the Cato Institute. No one in the room had ever seen or read the United States Constitution before.  
Arabic Constitution
  With the assistance of a simultaneous Arabic translator, I introduced our guests to the Constitution through the case of Snyder v. Phelps, relying on the lesson plan the Harlan Institute designed for high school students. I explained how the case as structured—(Petitioner) Matthew Snyder, father of slain Marine Mathew Snyder, objected to the protests from (Respondents) Fred Phelps and his family, and filed a lawsuit in federal district Court. Next, I explained how our tripartite federal judicial system is structured, discussing the interaction between the judges on the district, appellate, and Supreme Courts. With the procedural matters out of the way, I moved onto the substantive law. I asked each of them to turn to the page of their pocket Constitution that contained the First Amendment. None of them had ever been exposed to our great Charter. As I read it out loud, and saw their eyes following along in Arabic, I felt a joy that exceeds any other feeling I have ever had as a teacher. It was quite a rush. The jurists were very interested in FantasySCOTUS. One judge asked if we could create a version for the Tunisian judiciary. They were also quited interested in,HARLANconnect, the Harlan Institute’s platform to connect lawyers and professors with students using Skype. Several of the members who were responsible for promoting education in their country expressed an interest in Skyping with members of the Harlan network. I look forward to working with my new friends, and helping to promote the study of liberty and the rule of law around the World.

FantasySCOTUS.net Predictions for March 22, 2011

March 22, 2011
The Supreme Court has announced that it will issue one or more opinions on March 22, 2011. Here are the official FantasySCOTUS.net prediction tracker forecasts for all remaining cases.
Talk America v. Michigan Bell Affirm Details
Connick v. Thompson Reverse Details
Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Affirm Details
US v. Tohono O’odham Nation Affirm Details
Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Association Affirm Details
Sossamon v. Texas Affirm Details
Arizona Christian Tuition v. Winn Reverse Details
Cullen v. Pinholster Reverse Details
AT&T v. Concepcion Affirm Details
Flores-Villar v. US Affirm Details
Amara v. CIGNA Reverse Details
Schwarzenegger v. Plata Affirm Details
Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart Affirm Details
Kentucky v. King Reverse Details
Janus Capital v. 1st Derivative Traders Reverse Details
Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting Affirm Details
General Dynamics Corp. v. US Reverse Details
The Boeing Company v. US Reverse Details
Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano Reverse Details
Montana v. Wyoming and North Dakota Affirm Details
Goodyear Lux. Tires, SA v. Brown Reverse Details
J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro Reverse Details
Sykes v. US Reverse Details
Smith v. Bayer Corp. Reverse Details
Stern v. Marshall Affirm Details
Astra USA v. Santa Clara County Reverse Details
US v. Tinklenberg Reverse Details
Bond v. United States Reverse Details
Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB S.A. Affirm Details
Freeman v. US Affirm Details
DePierre v. United States Affirm Details
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Affirm Details
Schindler Elevator Corporation v. US ex rel. Kirk Affirm Details
Alford v. Greene Reverse Details
Camreta v. Greene Reverse Details
Bullcoming v. New Mexico Reverse Details
Ashcroft v. al-Kidd Reverse Details
Tolentino v. New York Affirm Details
Fox, v. Vice Affirm Details
Turner v. Rogers Reverse Details
J. D. B. v. North Carolina Affirm Details
McComish v. Bennett Reverse Details
Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett Reverse Details
Wal-Mart v. Dukes Reverse Details
Isiogu v. Michigan Bell Affirm Details
Actavis v. Mensing Affirm Details
PLIVA Inc. v. Mensing Affirm Details
Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership Affirm Details
Tapia v. U.S. Affirm Details
American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. Connecticut Affirm Details
United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation Affirm Details
Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. Affirm Details
Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation Reverse Details
Fowler v. United States Affirm Details

Fantasy Recap: Snyder v. Phelps in plain English

March 3, 2011
Today the Supreme Court decided Snyder v. Phelps. Eight Members of the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment protects the right of protestors to display signs containing offensive messages about gay people near funerals of fallen military service members. Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion. The signs discussed the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and our military, which are public, rather than private matters. When speech deals with a matter of public concern, it deserves stronger First Amendment protection. Additionally, the protestors stayed approximately 1,000 feet away from the funeral service, and Mr. Snyder, the father of the slain Marine, could only see the tops of the protestors’ signs. Therefore, the speech was protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Justice Alito disagreed with the Court, and wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Alito wrote that the death of Matthew Snyder was not a public issue, but a private issue. The First Amendment does not protect such outrageous conduct dealing with private matters. The protests caused the Snyder family a lot of pain and suffering. Justice Alito would have permitted the Snyder family to sue the protestors.

Podcast: Interview with Olivia Foster, Creator of TeenJury.com

March 1, 2011
Abbie (on the left) and Olivia (on the right) Foster, creators of TeenJury.com. (Photograph courtesy of Masslive.com)
  Olivia Foster, is a 14-year-old Freshman at Williston Northampton School in Easthampton, Massachusetts, and is the creator of TeenJury.com. TeenJury.com is a web site managed by teenagers dedicated to teaching other teens about the Supreme Court and our Constitution.The site provides an anatomy of a Supreme Case, biographies of the Supreme Court Justices, discussions of upcoming cases, recaps of recent cases, and news stories. Last fall, Olivia asked Justice Breyer to autograph a copy of his book, Making Our Democracy work. Justice Breyer  invited her to attend oral arguments, and wrote in her book, “To Olivia, hope to see you in November.” In November, Olivia attended arguments at the Supreme Court for Schwarzenneger v. EMA and Sossamon v. Texas as personal guests of Justice Breyer. This visit to the Court inspired Olivia to create TeenJury.com. In this podcast, I chat with Olivia about her site, how she created it, her experiences at the Supreme Court, and what she thinks more broadly about the state of civic education in America. Olivia has a bright future ahead of her, and no surprise, wants to attend law school. For more background, check out this profile on MassLive.com.
Popout
Original audio source (teenjury.mp3)

Harlan Institute’s HARLANconnect Featured on Skype in the Classroom’s Blog

February 21, 2011
Check out this fantastic post from the Skype Blog about the Harlan Institute and HARLANconnect. If your class is interested in participating in a Skype virtual mentoring session, sign up here. If you are interested in serving as a mentor, sign up here.

Podcast: Interview with Professor Tom Donnelly on Schwarzenneger v. EMA

February 8, 2011
Josh Blackman of the Harlan Institute interviewed Professor Tom Donnelly, a Climenko Fellow and Lecturer on Law at the Harvard Law School, about Schwarzenneger v. EMA. This case looks at whether the First Amendment of the Constitution bars California from restricting the sale of violent video games to children. Listen to the podcast here.
Popout
Original audio source (SchwarzennegerVEma.mp3)