News

The Supreme Court has announced that it will issue one or more opinions on March 22, 2011. Here are the official FantasySCOTUS.net prediction tracker forecasts for all remaining cases.

Talk America v. Michigan Bell	Affirm			Details
Connick v. Thompson	Reverse			Details
Kasten v. Saint-Gobain	Affirm			Details
US v. Tohono O’odham Nation	Affirm			Details
Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Association	Affirm			Details
Sossamon v. Texas	Affirm			Details
Arizona Christian Tuition v. Winn	Reverse			Details
Cullen v. Pinholster	Reverse			Details
AT&T v. Concepcion	Affirm			Details
Flores-Villar v. US	Affirm			Details
Amara v. CIGNA	Reverse			Details
Schwarzenegger v. Plata	Affirm			Details
Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. Stewart	Affirm			Details
Kentucky v. King	Reverse			Details
Janus Capital v. 1st Derivative Traders	Reverse			Details
Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting	Affirm			Details
General Dynamics Corp. v. US	Reverse			Details
The Boeing Company v. US	Reverse			Details
Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano	Reverse			Details
Montana v. Wyoming and North Dakota	Affirm			Details
Goodyear Lux. Tires, SA v. Brown	Reverse			Details
J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro	Reverse			Details
Sykes v. US	Reverse			Details
Smith v. Bayer Corp.	Reverse			Details
Stern v. Marshall	Affirm			Details
Astra USA v. Santa Clara County	Reverse			Details
US v. Tinklenberg	Reverse			Details
Bond v. United States	Reverse			Details
Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB S.A.	Affirm			Details
Freeman v. US	Affirm			Details
DePierre v. United States	Affirm			Details
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.	Affirm			Details
Schindler Elevator Corporation v. US ex rel. Kirk	Affirm			Details
Alford v. Greene	Reverse			Details
Camreta v. Greene	Reverse			Details
Bullcoming v. New Mexico	Reverse			Details
Ashcroft v. al-Kidd	Reverse			Details
Tolentino v. New York	Affirm			Details
Fox, v. Vice	Affirm			Details
Turner v. Rogers	Reverse			Details
J. D. B. v. North Carolina	Affirm			Details
McComish v. Bennett	Reverse			Details
Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett	Reverse			Details
Wal-Mart v. Dukes	Reverse			Details
Isiogu v. Michigan Bell	Affirm			Details
Actavis v. Mensing	Affirm			Details
PLIVA Inc. v. Mensing	Affirm			Details
Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership	Affirm			Details
Tapia v. U.S.	Affirm			Details
American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. Connecticut	Affirm			Details
United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation	Affirm			Details
Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.	Affirm			Details
Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation	Reverse			Details
Fowler v. United States	Affirm			Details

Today the Supreme Court decided Snyder v. Phelps. Eight Members of the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment protects the right of protestors to display signs containing offensive messages about gay people near funerals of fallen military service members. Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion. The signs discussed the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and our military, which are public, rather than private matters. When speech deals with a matter of public concern, it deserves stronger First Amendment protection. Additionally, the protestors stayed approximately 1,000 feet away from the funeral service, and Mr. Snyder, the father of the slain Marine, could only see the tops of the protestors’ signs. Therefore, the speech was protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Justice Alito disagreed with the Court, and wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Alito wrote that the death of Matthew Snyder was not a public issue, but a private issue. The First Amendment does not protect such outrageous conduct dealing with private matters. The protests caused the Snyder family a lot of pain and suffering. Justice Alito would have permitted the Snyder family to sue the protestors.

Check out this fantastic post from the Skype Blog about the Harlan Institute and HARLANconnect. If your class is interested in participating in a Skype virtual mentoring session, sign up here. If you are interested in serving as a mentor, sign up here.

Turn to page 10, or you can read the article online here. 

The American Bar Association Journal profiled the Harlan Institute in its February 2011 issue. Pending High Court Decisions Fan Interest in Fantasy League:

The words fantasy player and U.S. Supreme Court have never had a reason to be heard in the same breath, but for any law geek who’s ever dreamed of serving as the 10th justice, your fancy now can be fulfilled. The year-old website FantasySCOTUS lets aspiring Supreme Court justices, legal pundits and those of you with a tad too much time on your hands predict the outcome in pending U.S. Supreme Court cases. An aspiring academic, Blackman also has developed a version of the website for high school students atfantasySCOTUS.org. The offshoot was unplanned, but Blackman says he developed it after teachers began asking for it. So far an estimated 200 teachers and 1,000 students play. To support that offshoot, Blackman founded the Harlan Institute and spent his summer developing lesson plans. The Harlan Institute also places volunteer attorneys into classrooms using FantasySCOTUS. “We’ve created a savvy way for attorneys to do pro bono,” Blackman says. “They can even use Skype and volunteer right from their desks.”

The Harlan Institute is proud to announce the launch of HARLANconnect.

Popout

HARLANconnect revolutionizes the way attorneys and students interact. Classes sign up to learn from a virtual mentor about the Constitution and the Supreme Court Attorneys volunteer to mentor classes HARLANconnect facilitates Skype Video Calls and other virtual exchanges between classrooms and attorney mentors

What is HARLANconnect?

HARLANconnect is the Harlan Institute’s innovative platform to help connect attorneys, law professors, and law students with high school classes. Through the use of Skype Video calls, classrooms can connect with attorneys anywhere in the world, and learn more about the Constitution and the Supreme Court.

How does HARLANconnect work?

HARLANconnect provides a simple and easy way for classes to be mentored and learn from attorneys, law professors, and law students. First, interested classes request a mentor. Second, the Harlan Institute contacts one of the attorneys in our vast network, and attempts to locate a suitable mentor for the classroom. This mentor will be an attorney, law professor, or law student with a passion for the Constitution, and an interest in sharing his or her knowledge with tomorrow’s leaders and decision-makers. Third, after a mentor is paired with a class, the Harlan Institute will schedule an initial Skype video call. During this 45-minute call, the mentor will introduce the students to one of the cases pending before the Supreme Court this term, and highlight the constitutional issues in the case. Following the initial Skype Call, if both the class and the mentor concur, the Harlan Institute will schedule additional Skype calls and other forms of electronic exchange.

How do I get involved?

The goal of HARLANconnect is to make the mentoring process as easy and effective as possible. While the time commitment for all parties is rather small, we find that the virtual visits to classrooms are the next-best-thing to in-person visits. If you are an attorney, law student, or law professor, and are interested in mentoring a class, please fill out this form. If you are interested in signing your class up for a mentor, please select a lesson, and sign up for a time slot on this calendar.

Inspired by a history class project and the events leading Snyder v. Phelps to the Supreme Court, high school senior Zach Parker is using the legislative process to ban protests from military funerals.

BELFAST, Maine – It started out as a class history project for 17-year-old Searsport Regional High School student Zach Parker, but the more he learned, the more infuriated he became. How could a church picket funerals of dead soldiers? Parker said he has an uncle in the National Guard who might be deployed next year. “I can’t even think about if I had to lay him to rest for the last time and I’d have to deal with these people,” he said. The people are the members of the Westboro Baptist Church, a Kansas congregation that has made a name for itself by protesting at soldiers’ funerals across the country. Parker wants to stop them. The student is working on a plan to propose federal legislation to ban all protests at military funerals. Three federal laws and laws in at least 40 states, including Maine, limit protests near military funerals, but they do not prevent them. The U.S. Supreme Court has heard arguments against the church’s actions and is expected to rule on it next year.

Parker’s legislation, entitled “Respect for Fallen Heroes and Citizens Act of 2010,” reads: “No person shall protest including taunting, or showing any public display of disapproval one clock hour from the beginning and end of a funeral, burial or memorial service, and may not enter within three-hundred feet of the grounds.” On Wednesday, Parker presented his history project to the public:

The Searsport event began a little like a patriotic pep rally and included a prayer to honor all veterans, a rendition of “The Star-Spangled Banner” and a video featuring footage of dusty Middle East war zones. Many of the people in attendance said that Parker’s goal of keeping funerals free of people who would taunt, insult or annoy mourning family and friends sounded just about right to them. “The First Amendment is not an absolute,” said Charliy Michaud of Searsport. “There’s a certain level of common sense. I think it’s a wonderful idea, and I hope it works.” Danny Bowden of Bangor came down with several other members of The Exiles, a Maine-based motorcycle group. “I wanted to support this kid and this bill, because it’s not right to protest at any funeral, really, and especially our military funerals,” he said.

Although only 17, Parker’s legislation is receiving national attention, from U.S. Senators and Representatives toFox News. When asked by Fox & Friends co-host Dave Briggs on the message sent by his actions, Parkerresponded:

“I can tell you not to underestimate any project you’re given,” he said. “I certainly never expected to be on national news for this. This was just a small-town project and has turned out to be a national phenomenon.”

On that note, Parker’s history teacher is beaming with pride:

“I asked them to find something they’re interested in and become active. What would you do? Some take it to the extreme, which Zach did — it’s his personality,” said Parker’s history teacher, Gail Anthonis. “I think it’s a great way for kids to learn to be politically involved. They may be 17 or 18 years old, but they can do something. They can be heard.”

Harlan’s FantasySCOTUS asks students to examine Snyder v. Phelps, and think about these same issues. The Supreme Court is faced with a very real, relevant, and personal question – does the First Amendment protect the right of protesters to display signs containing offensive messages near funerals of fallen military service members? Please visit our site to sign up your classroom and download the lesson plan for your class on this issue. Parker’s interview on the Fox News morning show, Fox & Friends: Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com